I try to run my newest version of tests against crazy ivan, and I get four failed tests. As far as I can see, all four are based on some discrepancies between the syntax document and the test suite (or I misunderstood something). Here they are:

Tests #34 (and #38 which is more or less the same)
--------------------------------------------------

In Test #34 we have

<img         about="http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i";
                        rel="foaf:img"
                        src="http://sw-app.org/img/mic_2007_01.jpg";
                        alt="A photo depicting Michael" />

                        
and the requested triple is

<http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/img> <http://sw-app.org/img/mic_2007_01.jpg>

The current syntax document, however, uses @src as setting the subject, not the object. I know this was one of our evergreen discussion... what is it now?
                        
Test #63
--------

What is the latest agreement on what the value of ":next" should be? It is not clear (to me) in the text. The test suggests that ":next" should be in the xhtml vocab space, but my fear is that this may be a previous version of our status (ie, the test should be changed)

My understanding is that ":next" has an empty prefix, which should be the base URI...

Test #66:
---------

 <head instanceof="foaf:Document">
      <title>Test 0066</title>
   </head>
   <body>
      <p>This is test #66.</p>
   </body>

The test suggests that

<http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0066.xhtml> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Document>

ie, there is an implicit extra about on the <head>. I know we discussed this, we more or less agreed on that, but it is not on the syntax document as far as I can see...


--

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to