>The only change that is required now is to flip a flag in the manifest.
>The sparql files listed the triples which should _not_ have been
>generated in the old version; the new version _should_ generate those.
And this will be done, for sure (as soon as we've reviewed them :). If you
want me to, I'll change it right away, but IMHO it does not make a huge
difference, as the people who know about it (such as, e.g. Ivan ;) know anyway
that their implementation is right, and people who are not aware of it should
not care about unreviewed TC anyway (only the approved TC are valid and should
be taken into consideration).
Cheers,
Michael
----------------------------------------------------------
Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
<office>
phone: +43-316-876-1193 (fax:-1191)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
<https://webmail.joanneum.at/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.joanneum.at/iis/>
<private>
mobile: +43-660-7621761
web: http://www.sw-app.org/
<https://webmail.joanneum.at/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.sw-app.org/>
----------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ivan Herman
Sent: Sat 2008-04-05 12:35
To: Micah Dubinko
Cc: W3C RDFa task force
Subject: Re: Update of distiller (after minutes of 2008-04-03)
Tests 00095, 00096, 0097 were all testing this pattern albeit in old
setting, ie, checking that no triples are generated. They are still
listed as unreviewed test cases, though, ie, the TF has not approved
them yet (I presume that the reason is, well, the discussion leading to
this resolution!).
The only change that is required now is to flip a flag in the manifest.
The sparql files listed the triples which should _not_ have been
generated in the old version; the new version _should_ generate those.
Ivan
Micah Dubinko wrote:
> Is there a test case with markup like what's below? -m
>
> Ivan Herman wrote:
>> Having read the minutes of yesterday's meeting, I have updated the
>> distiller as follows:
>>
>> 1. use @typeof instead of @instanceof
>> 2. I have removed the part of the code that checked the 'superfluous'
>> triples. (Updating the code is easier than originally doing it; it
>> just means that return values are ignored, well, not even generated.
>> The structure of the processing steps remain the same otherwise...)
>>
>> Just to be on the safe side for #2, and to be sure that I understood
>> the changes right: the example in the syntax document, referring to:
>>
>> <div about="#A" rel="foaf:knows">
>> <div rel="foaf:knows">
>> <div rel="foaf:knows">
>> <span>bla bla</span>
>> </div>
>> </div>
>> </div>
>>
>> *will* generate the following set of triples:
>>
>> <#A> foaf:knows
>> [ foaf:knows
>> [
>> ]
>> ].
>>
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>
--
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
