On Saturday 24 January 2009 23:52:00 Shane McCarron wrote: > Because the are *namespace* URIs, not *vocabulary* URIs. They were > never intended to be expanded by concatenating the expanded prefix with > the value after the colon.
Hmm, I hope it's not getting to philosophical now ;-) I'm sure it's no longer
related to Stéphane's original question, but nevertheless let me ask: Wouldn't
it, in some cases, be reasonable to make XML namespace URIs usable as
vocabulary URIs? What URI would, e.g., the xhtml:h1 element have if you
wanted to talk about it in RDF like …
xhtml:h1
a :XHTMLElement ;
:content :text ;
... .
OK, so far, this is just a reinvention of any XML schema language in RDF, but
I could well imagine that there are reasonable use cases for attaching
_additional_ information to an XML schema using RDF. But as XML namespace
URIs don't end in / nor #, this would be impossible, or, at least, not nice.
Cheers,
Christoph
--
Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
