Manu Sporny wrote:
Another Q/A page has been started concerning questions surrounding RDFa,
including common red-herrings and repeated discussions (with answers)
that can be avoided when discussing what RDFa can and cannot do:
http://rdfa.info/wiki/common-arguments-against-rdfa
Help in filling out both pages would be greatly appreciated.
While I understand the frustration, the use of the term red-herring in
this context tends to escalate rather than deescalate the tensions.
I logged in via OpenId, but when I attempted to edit a page, I received
the following message:
You do not have permission to do that, for the following reason:
The action you have requested is limited to users in the group
emailconfirmed.
Meanwhile, here are a few pointers which can be mined for additions to
that page:
http://inamidst.com/notes/rdfinhtml
"only chartered to solve the problem for XHTML"
http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-January/018242.html
"but HTML is parsed different than XHTML..."
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/DesignPrinciplesReview#head-05402097db7a587b84515a314513fa9e40886a7c
"invisible metadata"
http://intertwingly.net/blog/2008/11/12/RDFaification#c1226526843
"qName antipattern"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Sep/0040.html
"two different definitions for rel attribute"
- Sam Ruby
