On 18/2/09 16:26, Danny Ayers wrote:
I've just been told that the anecdote referred to below was in fact
completely false, so I'd like to unreservedly retract the comment.
If anyone cares to read, much of the initial IMG discussion is in the Web,
Marc: http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0182.html
TimBL: http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0186.html
see also http://info.cern.ch/NextBrowser1.html
cheers,
Dan
Thanks,
Danny.
2009/2/18 Danny Ayers<danny.ay...@gmail.com>:
Incidentally I'm reminded of a (quite probably spurious) anecdote I
heard: when it was suggested that browsers display images, timbl
responded by saying it'll only lead to people publishing porn. True or
not, we know what happened. But it would be hard to argue that the
ability to display images is a bad thing.
Cheers,
Danny.
--
http://danny.ayers.name
