I agree that they MUST support IRIs as input. I think the question here
is what should they generate as output. I feel like the right answer is
that they should generate IRIs and that it is the responsibility of the
input to ensure the IRI is legal. All the RDFa spec says is that the
IRI associated with the prefix is concatenated with the suffix. It
doesn't say anything about transformation.
KANZAKI Masahide wrote:
Hi
2009/3/28 Manu Sporny <mspo...@digitalbazaar.com>:
If there are no objections, I can create a test case to ensure that
percent-encoding is performed before the RDFa parser generates a triple.
I think RDFa parsers should accept IRI refs [1], not performing
percent encoding for multi-byte characters that are allowed in IRIs.
cheers,
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3987
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: sh...@aptest.com
