On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 12:41 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote:
> You can find the latest version at 
> http://www3.aptest.com/standards/rdfa-html/

For XMLLiterals which aren't well-formed would it be a good compromise
to say that the literal should still be generated as normal (i.e.
including tags) but just shouldn't be given an rdf:XMLLiteral datatype?

e.g.

        <p property="rdfs:comment">Hello<br>World</p>

Generates:

        <rdf:Description about="">
          <rdfs:comment>Hello&lt;br&gt;World</rdfs:comment>
        </rdf:Desciption>

This makes it more consistent with XHTML+RDFa.

-- 
Toby Inkster <t...@g5n.co.uk>


Reply via email to