On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 12:41 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote: > You can find the latest version at > http://www3.aptest.com/standards/rdfa-html/
For XMLLiterals which aren't well-formed would it be a good compromise to say that the literal should still be generated as normal (i.e. including tags) but just shouldn't be given an rdf:XMLLiteral datatype? e.g. <p property="rdfs:comment">Hello<br>World</p> Generates: <rdf:Description about=""> <rdfs:comment>Hello<br>World</rdfs:comment> </rdf:Desciption> This makes it more consistent with XHTML+RDFa. -- Toby Inkster <t...@g5n.co.uk>