I remember we had long discussions whether a literal is normalized or not, and we decided that we should not (I remember Steven's argument on typing poetry...)
Ivan Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > Ivan, > >> Isn't that correct? > > Hm. Well, my reading of the processing rules [1], step 9, is that, if > > 'the body of the [current element] does have non-text child nodes but > @datatype is present, with an empty value.' > > then the [current object literal] should be a plain literal, where > > '... The actual literal is either the value of @content (if present) or a > string created by concatenating the text content of each of the descendant > elements of the [current element] in document order.' > > which would support your argument. > > Mark? Shane? > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#sec_5.5. -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
