Ian Hickson wrote:
...
Nor do I think it's fair to cast the concerns that have been raised regarding RDFa as dubious, and nor am I aware of any serious effort to actually fix all the problems, only some of the more eggregious ones like the use of xmlns="". For example, I'm not aware of any plans to remove the prefix mechanism from RDFa altogether, or replace the URI-based identifier mechanism with something more friendly.
...

That may be because there's absolutely no agreement that these aspects *are* problematic.

BR, Julian

Reply via email to