I agree that this is great news. However, when I went and LOOKED at the
page we use in our examples, http://dbpedia.org/page/Albert_Einstein , I
see that it is invalid in a number of respects. It is unfortunate that
dbpedia is at the mercy of the resources they troll. The markup ends up
being hard to manage, I suspect.
I was forced to put my parser into "html" mode to get it to swallow that
page:
http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/rdfa/extract_rdfa.pl?format=n3&type=html&uri=http://dbpedia.org/page/Albert_Einstein
Ivan Herman wrote:
FYI
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa
Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:32:01 +0000
Resent-From: public-...@w3.org
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:31:19 -0400
From: Kingsley Idehen <kide...@openlinksw.com>
To: public-...@w3.org
CC: public-lod <public-...@w3.org>,
"dbpedia-discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net"
<dbpedia-discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net>
References:
<f914914c0909160749s4adaa3b5q517b418a1b0a9...@mail.gmail.com>
<4ab1024e.4000...@openlinksw.com>
All,
Quick FYI.
All DBpedia pages now include RDFa. Thus, re. the DBpedia Linked Data
Space, you now have HTML+RDFa as a structured metadata representation
alternative to N3, Turtle, RDF/XML, and RDF/JSON (*new*).
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: sh...@aptest.com
