Mark raised the issue today of producing a 1.1 version of RDFa Syntax.
I think that's a fine idea, and that we should get started on it ASAP.
But I also think that we could almost immediately produce a Second
Edition as a PER. The things I would incorporate into such a document are:
* Integrate the XML Schema implementation of XHTML+RDFa.
* Update our references.
* Add @lang into the language, with the precedence rules as defined
in XHTML 1.1 Second Edition [1] and XHTML Basic 1.1 Second Edition
[2]. This would keep RDFa+XHTML consistent with XHTML 1.1, and
make it more useful for people who use assistive technologies.
* Integrate any clarifications we have identified via errata.
What do people think about refreshing the current Recommendation?
[1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/ED-xhtml11-20090916
[2] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/ED-xhtml-basic-20090916
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: sh...@aptest.com
