Ah, right. I would propose to make this explicit in the processing step #3, too.
Ivan On 2010-1-14 16:44 , Shane McCarron wrote: > See http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2010/ED-rdfa-syntax-20100113/#s_xhtmlrdfa > > This specification also adds the |lang| attribute to the I18N attribute > collection as defined in [XHTMLMOD > <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2010/ED-rdfa-syntax-20100113/references.html#ref_xhtml_modularization>]. > The |lang| attribute is defined in [HTML4 > <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2010/ED-rdfa-syntax-20100113/references.html#ref_html4>]. > When this attribute and the |xml:lang| attribute are specified on the > same element, the |xml:lang| attribute takes precedence. When both > |lang| and |xml:lang| are specified on the same element, they SHOULD > have the same value. > > This is the same text as is in XHTML 1.1 etc. > > Ivan Herman wrote: >> Looking at the text: it is not clear to me whether @xml:lang or @lang >> have the priority. Ie, what happens if they both appear on an element >> with different values? >> >> Ivan >> >> On 2010-1-13 23:39 , Shane McCarron wrote: >> >>> Sorry for the delay - there were some technical difficulties. However, >>> I have uploaded a very drafty RDFa Syntax 1.1. You can get to it via >>> the drafts page at http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf vCard : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
