> That scope was brought before the W3C advisory committee in the HTML > charter, and saying it's "in scope" only says the discussion may take > place, it doesn't predict an outcome of the discussion.
I'd like to be 100% clear on this. Are you saying that, as a result of discussion and consultation, the W3C might decide that 'content protection' is actually out of scope for the W3C? Not just reject the EME proposal, but reject 'content protection' altogether? Because everything I've heard so far suggests otherwise - that at best EME might be rejected, but that an alternative method of 'content protection' will be adopted. -- Duncan Bayne ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype: duncan_bayne I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours. If there's something urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me.
