On 15/05/14 14:09, cobaco wrote: > we've been over the answer time and again on this list... > > There's a major difference between: > - supporting a legacy api that has been abused to provide drm and that's on > the way out anyway, and > - supporting a brand new api that is going to be used for nothing but DRM
There's even a question in our soon-I-hope-to-be-published Technical FAQ entitled "Why doesn't Mozilla let DRM die with NPAPI plugins?". :-) The answer, of course, is that our competitors aren't, and that we are at an increasing competitive disadvantage. Firefox with just a handful of users, which is where that road ends, means the open web loses entirely (not just one battle). Gerv
