> If a class has a particular 'definition' (i.e., the criteria for
> membership of its instances) at a particular time and that definition
> 'changes' then we are talking about a different class
> altogether not a 'version' of the same class - the extension of both
> classes are no longer the same.  Unless the definition change is
> annotative only and doesn't really have any 'logical' consequences.  In
> which case a SKOS, time-stamped annotation for a human reader is
> sufficient and what we really have in mind.

[VK] This is a very interesting question and Chimezie has suggested some
criteria to address this.

Maybe we can take some ideas from way software is versioned, i.e., when is
something a major release vs a minor release? Just thinking aloud ...




THE INFORMATION TRANSMITTED IN THIS ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED ONLY 
FOR THE PERSON OR ENTITY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL 
AND/OR PRIVILEGED MATERIAL.  ANY REVIEW, RETRANSMISSION, DISSEMINATION OR OTHER 
USE OF OR TAKING OF ANY ACTION IN RELIANCE UPON, THIS INFORMATION BY PERSONS OR 
ENTITIES OTHER THAN THE INTENDED RECIPIENT IS PROHIBITED.  IF YOU RECEIVED THIS 
INFORMATION IN ERROR, PLEASE CONTACT THE SENDER AND THE PRIVACY OFFICER, AND 
PROPERLY DISPOSE OF THIS INFORMATION.



Reply via email to