This may also be an interesting way of intersecting microarray (mageml)
and semantic web (rdfa) ...
-Kei
Ivan Herman wrote:
I am sorry if I come into this thread very late. Additionally to what
Ralph just said, the RDFa distiller running on the W3C site:
http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/
should actually work with an arbitrary XML file, although only SVG is
'announced' there (which is probably my mistake). If there is a problem
then, well... it is my bug:-(
Ivan
Ralph R. Swick wrote:
At 10:48 PM 6/23/2009 +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
I see that the 2008 draft
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/rdfa-overview
says
"RDFa itself is intended to be a technique that allows for adding metadata to any
(XML) markup document, including SMIL, RSS, SVG, MathML, etc. Note, however, that in the
current state, RDFa is being defined only for the (X)HTML family of languages."
The RDFa specification was designed with the intent that other
languages than XHTML could take advantage of RDFa markup.
(The terminology "host language" was used in some drafts
to signal this direction.) The charter under which the group
was operating was specific to XHTML, thus the wording in
the W3C Recommendation.
So I think I will go ahead and add some RDFa markup to the
XML,
By all means, reuse the RDFa vocabulary if it seems appropriate
for your application.
