FYI - These documents/links below could be part of the ongoing discussion about improving the quality of RDF for life sciences data.
Cheers, Scott -- M. Scott Marshall, W3C HCLS IG co-chair, http://www.w3.org/blog/hcls http://staff.science.uva.nl/~marshall ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Annika Flemming <[email protected]> Date: Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:31 AM Subject: Re: Quality Criteria for SKOS vocabularies To: Christian Mader <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected], [email protected] Hi Christian, nice work! As you mentioned my draft about Linked Data quality, you might be interested in my finished thesis, which can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/diplom-af It's written in German. Cheers, Annika Am 11.04.2011 08:46, schrieb Christian Mader: > > Hi, > > In the course of my PhD project at the University of Vienna I'm going to > address the question how to programmatically support collaborative creation > of "good-quality" SKOS vocabularies. I have found 14 criteria that, in my > opinion, could be used to assess the quality of said vocabularies. It would > be really helpful for me to get some community input on these criteria, so I > published them here: > > https://github.com/cmader/qSKOS/wiki/Quality-Criteria-for-SKOS-Vocabularies > > Please feel free to post your comments and suggestions regarding that matter, > every kind of input will be warmly appreciated. > > Best, > Christian >
