That makes sense, then. Jim
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Alasdair J G Gray < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > On 10 Sep 2013, at 16:02, Jim McCusker <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think Jerven's point is that it's unclear why having additional > properties would warrant an error or a warning, when this is actually a > good thing. > > > I agree and understand your point. What I was meaning was that it would be > flagged in someway that additional properties were provided; in order to be > informative. > > The way the validator is designed, it will return: > > - Error messages for properties that MUST be there and which are not > present. > - Warning messages for properties that SHOULD be there and which are > not present. > - Information messages for other properties that are detected. > > Given the use of properties that MAY be present, we (Manchester) will need > to revisit this design decision. However my first goal will be to get a > validator up that generates the above messages. > > Alasdair > > > Jim > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Alasdair J G Gray < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Jerven, hello. >> >> I should have stated in the notes yesterday that the current validator is >> not complete. (I'm afraid I've been too busy to be able to complete this >> part of the work.) >> >> On 9 Sep 2013, at 17:43, Jerven Bolleman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Thanks for starting up again, and sorry for missing this. >> >> I had a quick question about the validator. Currently it seems to fail if >> a resource has an unknown type such as foaf:Organization . >> Is this correct? or is my dyslexia getting the better of me? >> >> >> However, I do not think that you should have received an error; perhaps a >> warning saying that additional properties were provided. >> >> Once I've completed the validator, it would be good to re-test your file >> and see what should be the appropriate output in this case. >> >> Regards, >> >> Alasdair >> >> >> Regards, >> Jerven >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Alasdair J G Gray < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> Attached are the notes that I took during the call today. >>> >>> Speak to you all next week. >>> >>> Alasdair >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Dr Alasdair J G Gray >>> Research Associate >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~graya/ >>> >>> Please consider the environment before printing this email. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Jerven Bolleman >> [email protected] >> >> >> Dr Alasdair J G Gray >> Research Associate >> [email protected] >> >> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~graya/ >> >> Please consider the environment before printing this email. >> >> > > > -- > Jim McCusker > > Data Scientist > 5AM Solutions > [email protected] > http://5amsolutions.com > > PhD Student > Tetherless World Constellation > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > [email protected] > http://tw.rpi.edu > > > Dr Alasdair J G Gray > Research Associate > [email protected] > > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~graya/ > > Please consider the environment before printing this email. > > -- Jim McCusker Data Scientist 5AM Solutions [email protected] http://5amsolutions.com PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute [email protected] http://tw.rpi.edu
