On 26/03/15 10:25, Steve Harris wrote:
On 26 Mar 2015, at 10:10, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
On 24/03/15 16:48, Fabiano Luz wrote:
Hello Folks,
On the predicate lists we have omitted the subject, for example:
?x foaf:name ?name ;
foaf:mbox ?mbox .
I wonder if there is some kind of "subject lists" where we omitted the
predicate, for example:
foaf:Bob foaf:phone ?phone1; foaf:John ?phone2 .
PS: I do not want to repeat the predicate.
best regards
--
Fabiano Ferreira Luz®
MsC in Computer Science
Fabiano,
There isn't any specific syntax to abbreviate in that way (in Turtle or SPARQL), only "same
subject, same predicate", not "different subject, same predicate".
What's you use case for this?
I was wondering about this, what happens if you write:
:foo ^rdf:value :a , :b , :c .
:foo ^rdf:value :a .
:foo ^rdf:value :b .
:foo ^rdf:value :c .
That might help or it might not (in SPARQL patterns, not Turtle, not in
construct templates, not in update templates).
Is then ":a" a "subject"?
Yes - in a forward arc sense.
No - in the written form sense as described.
Andy
- Steve
