On 21/07/15 13:35, Gary King wrote:
Thanks Andy and Bob,
My plan was indeed to go with SPARQL/JSON output for the reasons you suggest.
Is there a move afoot to switch SPARQL/XML to XML 1.1 in some future version?
In Jena or for the W3C specs?
For Jena - send a pull request - at a guess, changes to
XMLOutputResultSet. Some &# encoding and setting 1.1.
Reading devolves to
For efficiency and streaming reasons, the writer is directly outputing XML.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-942
for workarounds for the Java/STaX issue.
For the W3C specs - no plans as far as I know. W3C haven't hinted at
anything. The most there is an errata process.
An agreement amongst users and implementers (stores and client
libraries) to deal with XML 1.0/1.1 is probably the way to go.
There is talk of a community activity to maintain the (RDF|SPARQL) tests.
Andy
There is a real raw control-Z in that line (which is illegal in XML 1.0). It just
displays as a space character in some fonts. if I cut&paste the line into
emacs it displays as ^Z.
Ah, my bad. Thanks for catching that.
Emit XML 1.1 if you need to.
Okay.
thanks again,
--
Gary Warren King, metabang.com
Cell: (413) 559 8738
Fax: (206) 338-4052
gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM * gwking on twitter
