I’m now merging this PR, which also updated the dawgt namespace to add dawgt:Proposed.
Gregg Kellogg gr...@greggkellogg.net > On Nov 9, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Gregory Williams <g...@evilfunhouse.com> wrote: > > On Nov 9, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gr...@greggkellogg.net> wrote: >> >> With control of the dawgt vocabulary, we could add a new approval status >> (dawgt:Proposed). I don’t think we should remove dagwt:approval for >> otherwise existing tests, though. It’s been proposed to clean up the >> manifests be removing everything which is Rejected, Obsoleted, or Withdrawn >> as being confusing; the only tests remaining would be those which should >> actually be run. > > I would support adding a Proposed status. > > As for existing tests, my proposal to clean up the SPARQL test suite would > only remove commented-out tests and tests that are marked as Approved but > which were withdrawn and removed from the manifest list. None of the tests in > the test suite are marked as Rejected, Obsoleted, or Withdrawn. There are, > however, some commented-out tests marked as NotClassified (along with the two > new tests that were added in #21, which could change to Proposed). > > thanks, > .greg > >
