On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:37 AM, james anderson <ja...@dydra.com> wrote:
> good afternoon; > > On 2016-04-25, at 20:41, Alexandre Riazanov <ariaza...@systap.com> wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I would appreciate any help on the following problem related to > interpretation of the SPARQL 1.1 standard. > > ok. > > […] > > > Now, consider the specific query in > https://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/subquery/sq03.rq : > > > select ?x where { > graph ?g { > {select ?x where {?x ?p ?g}} > } > } > > To leave the issue of variable scoping aside, > > > details may be more significant than initially apparent. > the manifest indicates that the dataset is to be imported into a named > graph. > the test presumes that this graph is available as one of the named graphs > in the default dataset. > the binding for which is not that same as the binding for the object in > the statement pattern. > > ok? > Got it, thanks! > > best regards, from berlin, > --- > james anderson | ja...@dydra.com | http://dydra.com > > > > > > -- ====================================== Alexandre Riazanov (Alexander Ryazanov), PhD Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada Skype: alexandre.riazanov http://riazanov.webs.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/riazanov tel: +1 506 639 1529 ======================================
