That's interesting, but when I click on any of the systems, I get asked for a password so I can't see the actual results.
peter On 06/30/2016 05:04 AM, Karima Rafes wrote: > Hello > >> The CG would document a solution and create tests to pass over to the "RDF >> Tests" CG [3]. > > My company can join at this effort and can fusion the tool sparqlscore > [1] and a SPARQL editor [2], if the W3C needs to help. > With this new tools, the process to create a new test would be very > short and a new benchmark would be available in 24h . > > Karima > [1] http://sparqlscore.com/ > [2] https://io.datascience-paris-saclay.fr/exampleInsertUpdate.php > > 2016-06-30 13:45 GMT+02:00 Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschnei...@gmail.com>: >> I would join. >> >> peter >> >> On 06/30/2016 04:40 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> There are bugs in the SPARQL specification with regards to EXISTS. The RDF >>> Data Shapes working group uses EXISTS, and other related mechanisms, in >>> SHACL >>> [1]. >>> >>> W3C process for corrections is recognized generally to be inflexible. It >>> is normally to wait for the next WG to run and end which is a multiyear >>> cycle - that does not fit with the RDF Data Shapes WG timescale. >>> >>> Community Groups can publish reports. These are not W3C standards. They >>> do provide a way to record consensus or enumerate alternatives. This could >>> be >>> used to supplement the SPARQL errata process [2]. >>> >>> A suggestion is to use the W3C Community Group mechanism to describe a >>> solution to this specific area in a timely manner. The CG would document a >>> solution and create tests to pass over to the "RDF Tests" CG [3]. If there >>> is >>> no single consensus on one solution within the SPARQL community, including >>> implementers and users, we can at least document a small set of approaches >>> and >>> note the approaches taken by implementations. >>> >>> Thoughts and comments? >>> >>> Please indicate if you would join such an effort. >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ >>> [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/sparql-errata >>> [3] https://www.w3.org/community/rdf-tests/ >>> >>> >>
