On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Ilya Grigorik <igrigo...@google.com> wrote: > Understood, that's fine. But, I don't think that should block us from using > "protocol" in NT/RT: (a) it's the right name, (b) the URL version is no > longer accurate or useful in most cases. We should nudge developers towards > using the NT/RT version, and keeping the same name is actually a plus in > that regard.
When it comes to URLs, protocol refers to the bit before the ":". In the platform's API landscape, I think that's the only thing "protocol" has meant thus far. And getting at the bit before the ":" is still useful. It's just wildly different from what you're talking about. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
