Though, now that I really grok what you wrote, Boris, you clearly get what I'm trying to do and know way more about how to do it than I do! I'm very open to suggestions and saving-from-myself here. :)
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Nat Duca <nd...@google.com> wrote: > Yeah it seems like we should ditch the typedef rename and introduce a new > LazyPerformanceEntryArray object. > > The design goal I had in mind for this was to avoid construction of > PerformanceEntry objects until you actually needed them. Accessing these > entries is quite slow to just buffering them. > > That is, it was intentional to not have forEach and other things on these > arrays. This is like NodeList --- QuerySelectorAll gives back a ton of > stuff, but you have to work to get the actual contents. > > In this case, too, good performance timing discipline requires you to not > crack open performance events when you get these records. > > So basically, I actually think its bad to support forEach on the object > without some additional work.... > > We could, perhaps, have a sequence<PerformanceEntry> AsSequence() method > for people who want to treat this as a seuence? >
