On 04/27/2016 07:23 PM, Ilya Grigorik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <p...@w3.org
<mailto:p...@w3.org>> wrote:
I agree. The spec did not indicate either way until we landed
[1] and I
think we can: (a) keep it as such for L1, (b) resolve it in L2. With
that in mind, we would probably need to back out that commit for L1?
Yes, in the v1 branch. gh-pages should not be affected by L1 imho.
Agreed. Will you make the change, or do you want me to?
I added them in the list.
Also created the V1 branch:
https://rawgit.com/w3c/resource-timing/V1/index.html
In particular, check my changes and notes in the section "4.2 Resources
Included in the PerformanceResourceTiming Interface"
https://rawgit.com/w3c/resource-timing/V1/index.html#resources-included
Philippe
