Dear all, FYI In case you do not follow the web app conversation, Mike West from google is looking for a place to develop an interesting API dedicated to manage credentials. The initial contribution which can be found under http://mikewest.github.io/credentialmanagement/spec/ offers a credential manager which allows to play with credential (including in a scheme of federated identity) and get status of login operations. This API, at the moment, does not require at the moment any specific security constraint with respect to credential storage.
Regards, virginie From: Mike West [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: mercredi 24 septembre 2014 15:57 To: Brad Hill; Dan Veditz; [email protected]; GALINDO Virginie; Webapps WG Cc: Jonas Sicking; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Wendy Seltzer; [email protected] Subject: Looking for a home for a proposed Credential Management API. (I'd originally sent this just to the folks on to: and cc:. Art reminded me that public is better, so I'm resending to public-webapps@, and BCCing public-webappsec@ for visibility). Hello, chairs of the WebApps, WebAppSec, and WebCrypto WGs! On Friday, I had an encouraging discussion with Jonas Sicking (CC'd) about the Credential Management API proposed a month or so ago on WebApps (http://mikewest.github.io/credentialmanagement/spec/). Chrome has started experimenting with an implementation, and though we're nowhere near even considering shipping it, I'd like to make sure that our implementation doesn't get too far out ahead of the spec process. I think it's fair to say that Mozilla is interested in continuing the discussion around the short-term and long-term goals of such an API in an appropriate venue. I'd like your collective opinion about what that venue might be. WebApps seems like the right place just in terms of having the right people involved. It would require a recharter, however, and it's not clear to me that that would be a worthwhile use of folks' time. Both WebCrypto and WebAppSec are in the process of rechartering, which resolves that potential issue, but neither really seems to be appropriate, as they're concerned with aspects other than credentials and authentication. There's a credentials community group that has nothing to do with the proposal, and given the weak IPR protections of a CG, I'd prefer to avoid them in the long run (though they might be the right place for short-term incubation). Brad suggested that an authentication WG might be spun up out of the conversations in the recent WebCrypto workshop. Are there concrete plans for such a group? Thanks! -mike -- Mike West <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.) ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.
