A core part of the Web Security model is based on SOP.

However, the world (outside of the Web) isn't working according this model; it 
is rather ad-hoc.

This has lead to the "App-explosion" which is better aligned (for good or for 
worse) to needs of the world than a SOP-crippled Web.

Since SOP (if taken literally) would more or less kill the Web, the 
"Super-Providers" have come to rescue.  That is, browsers still adhere to SOP 
but this is effectively short-circuited by services like PayPal which enable payments to 
any domain.

This is where it (IMO) gets wrong.  If Super-Providers are trusted for 
mediating access to arbitrary domains, why couldn't [properly designed] 
applications also perform this task?

In addition, payments and authentication (to take an example), typically 
exhibit quite different privacy- and security-characteristics making the 
SOP-hammer a pretty blunt tool.

-- Anders

Reply via email to