On 2015-09-23 15:57, Harry Halpin wrote:
On 09/23/2015 03:42 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote:
In my opinion the #1 problem with this discussion is that when you
mention things that doesn't match the SOP vision like the fact that Android-,
Apple-, and Samsung-Pay doesn't work on the Web, dead silence is all you get.
<ad hominem attacks>
> </ad hominem attacks>
In particular, it is likely more productive for various non-SOP schemes
to find a way to adopt to SOP in a principled manner and so maintain
security and privacy properties. Payment schemes, identity schemes, and
the rest should and can do this.
This topic has never been discussed in for example:
http://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/
Maybe Jeff should take down the flag
http://www.w3.org/2015/01/banker_payments.pdf
before it gets too embarrassing?
Anders
