On 2015-12-23 11:31, David Chadwick wrote:
I would have thought that the battle of control was fought and won years
ago. Essentially the credit card issuers control the system, since they
pay the RP, give the users credit, and learn about all the users'
transactions. I suspect they would love to learn more about these
transactions as well, but that would violate the users' privacy. Once
the system will allow credit card issuers to issue electronic tokens
rather than have the user type in credit card details, it will reduce
fraud and cost.
Agreed.
FIDO is able to do this.
This is claimed every now and then.
We are still waiting for the FIDO alliance to publish information showing how.
Anders
David
On 23/12/2015 09:35, Anders Rundgren wrote:
On 2015-12-23 10:30, Mountie Lee wrote:
I understand this is also touching SOP issue of Web.
Indeed it does.
who control the web? user? server?
Or as I would like to put it: how can third-parties add something new
and cool to the Web/Browser ecosystem?
Anders
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloa...@gmail.com
<mailto:noloa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> that means we don't need server assist to communicate between
Web and App?
>
> I have no idea how all pieces fit together.
>
> I also don't know the process for introducing a custom
wallet/payment
> system.
I would not expect one.
There's a big battle going on behind the scenes. Its about who
controls the payment information and the data. The data from all
those
transactions will be worth billions.
Companies like Apple, Google and Microsoft want it, while other
companies like mobile OEMs and carriers want it. The first casualty
appeared to be Isis/Softcard.
Jeff
--
Mountie Lee
PayGate
CTO, CISSP
Tel : +82 2 2140 2700
E-Mail : moun...@paygate.net <mailto:moun...@paygate.net>
