On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:50:33 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
So instead of "If the document was not an XML document" having "If
Content-Type did not contain such a media type"?
Sounds good to me.
Made this change. What Björn says makes sense, but since it's illegal to
follow that convention...
Of these, I only know for sure that text/xsl is in common use for
sending XML content, even though it is unofficial and technically
illegal.
Any proposals? Personally I don't really care about any of them...
I don't really care either, I'd be happy with a/x, t/x, and +xml.
The only one not on the current list that Safari supports is text/xsl.
Does Safari actually support it or just looks for it in the
pseudo-attribute "type" on the style sheet processing instruction? I
wonder if all implementations treat text/xsl as XML...
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
