* Robin Berjon wrote: >Have you considered being compatible (if only by subset) with SVG >Tiny 1.2 progress events? > > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/interact.html#EventsLoadProgress > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/svgudom.html#events::ProgressEvent
SVG could http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-LS/load-save.html#LS-LSParser consider compatible with existing specifications also... >I'm not sure what (and who) exactly you're asking here :) If you're >just asking the community if it's a good idea, then sure, but please >take the above into account. If you're asking the WG, we can't really >sanction implementation decisions. I think your proposal is sensical, >but it would likely be pushed over to XHR2 as v1 is more about >getting something basic and cleaned up on which to build this sort of >addition. I note that an event name 'progress' in no namespace and no prefix is likely to clash with W3C's work on XHR, so I don't think it would be a good idea to give no advise on this. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
