On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:30:31 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What we could do is to say that this is compatible with having
XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget. And that this is how they are intended
to be in a future revision of the spec. This way implementations can
implement it this way right away.
This wouldn't really be different from making XHR an EventTarget right
away and recommend that authors just use .onreadystatechange where com-
patibility with legacy implementations is a concern.
I agree. What are the issues with XHR being an EventTarget?
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
