On 5/15/06, Jim Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't agree on a "whitelist" that everyone can agree on supporting, since if we put CHICKENS on a whitelist and a UA decides that is actually insecure and blocks it, it should be free to do so, so the whitelist will give us nothing, simply SHOULD support any VERB, and you're free to block any you want for security reasons is a much more sensible policy than a non mandatory whitelist.
+1 for "SHOULD support any VERB" with specific notations about currently blacklisted verbs. -- Brad Fults NeatBox
