On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:35:24 +0200, Jim Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The shortest name should represent the most efficient method imho.Crazy notion, names should be clear, not short for efficiency.
The point was that if the more efficient one of the two actually had a longer name, people would probably use the shorter name and just take the first node using [0] or whatever can be used for that in their language binding.
-- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
