On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:50:52 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now there are several obvious modifications to this system that could be
made:
[...]
How about having specified in the IDL which parameters default to certain
value when omitted? So both the parameter being omitted is specified and
it's value to be assumed by the UA is.
void() test(foo, [bar] null)
Would be a way to do it I guess. (I don't really like the syntax though...)
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
