On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Karl Dubost wrote: > Le 27 juil. 06 à 07:08, Ian Hickson a écrit : > > On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > What is hostile content? > > > > Content that attempts to subvert the implementation. > > Then say it. I think it will help.
I'll leave that up to the editor, but frankly IMHO "hostile content" is a perfectly well understandable phrase that says exactly what it means. > > > How do you test the "remain stable" assertion? > > > > Spot checking, mostly, though this is an area that has a number of > > domain experts and, indeed, a community dedicated to finding such > > issues. > > Note that we were more than happy to see a security section. Personally I think that having a separate security section is a bad way of designing a spec, since it doesn't encourage you to think of security the whole time -- it's better, IMHO, to have security right at the core of the specification text. But again, I'll leave that up to the editor. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
