Hello,
Here are my comments on the last WD Selectors API : 1. I think the title of the document is badly chosen. The spec* does not offer any API on selectors themselves but, in substance, offers an implementation for document.getElementsBySelector(). Since we may have in the future a real API for accessing selectors themselves into the CSS OM, I strongly recommend a name more related to the contents than it is today. 2. I think it's an error to restrict this new API to the document level, in particular if we have scoped stylesheets in the near future. I recommend extending the API to all nodes. 3. for scoped stylesheets, and if item 2 above is accepted, I recommend adding a boolean parameter to both matchSingl() and matchAll() methods saying if it's a scoped request or not. In the case of a scoped request, the :root pseudo-class then represents the current node on which the method is invoked. 4. I really hate having two different methods for matchSingle and matchAll, and I'd prefer a single method with a boolean indicating if only the first result should be retrieved or all. The result should always be a StaticNodeList. If the boolean is true, then the length of the result is <= 1, and it's unconstrained otherwise. 5. Disruptive Innovations SARL becoming a W3C member on the 1st of October, we are ready to help on this specification. Best, </Daniel>
