On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:55:42 +0100, Chris Wilson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anne van Kesteren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Dave Massy wrote:]
As I mentioned previously a more complete example of staticNodeList
usage would also be appreciated.
It's not clear to me what you mean with that. It's exactly like the
thing getElementsByTagName returns except it's not live. This should
be pretty clear from the draft.
I think the points are that 1) the minimalist cases are kinda confusing
(when it's all HTML namespace, e.g., that you don't really need the
namespace param),
Why is that? It all depends on the document it is used with...
2) there's no information on what happens with
undefined HTML namespaces (e.g. no doctype, but I have an XHTML
namespace defined in NSResolver),
I don't understand this scenario.
and 3) an example should probably
explicitly be given that shows removing an element that is in the
staticNodeList from the tree, and that it's still accessible.
Do you have a proposed example? I'm willing to add such a thing.
I don't
think Dave was saying there's a problem there, just that there's a lot
of ambiguity, and that's how we got into a lot of the DOM
incompatibility messes to begin with. :)
I don't think there's any ambiguity with the normative prose of the
specification. So far you only commented on examples (besides the whole
naming debate) and gave a scenario that didn't make sense to me that might
affect the normative prose, but I doubt it.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
