On Jan 09, 2007, at 10:45, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:48:41 +0100, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, I agree with that. What's the rationale for not having
"bindings-are-ready" and "bound"?
'bound' on its own is too vague.
Alright, "binding-bound" then.
Cool, another naming thread! I think "bondage-accomplished" is much
better.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The sound principle of a topsy-turvy lifestyle in the framework of
an upside-down world order has stood every test."
-- Karl Kraus
