Anne van Kesteren schrieb:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:11:03 +0100, Julian Reschke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. The problem is the spec saying "...nothing SHOULD be done...". I
think it's better to be explicit what the implementation should do (in
this case, ignore the method call).
Oh, ok. It wasn't clear to me what you meant. (I thought it was a
comment about not mentioning "server".)
Changed to:
For security reasons the invocation SHOULD be ignored
if the header argument matches one of the following
headers case-insensitively:
Yes. Much better.
Best regards, Julian
