On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:58:24 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it might be wiser to add a .responseHTML that works for HTML documents in the future, since you can test for a new property from script but you can't test for new behavior of an existing property. And that could in principle have different rules for choosing the text encoding.
You would simply test if .responseXML is non-null. However, I don't really like that we get different character encoding detection schemes on a per property basis. I rather have it on a resource basis. So that responseText always uses the same decoding as responseXML, etc.
-- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
