It would probably be better to add the event listeners before setting the
href attribute, because if the image is cached, the UA might very well
load it synchronously, or the load timeout might not be enough until the
load listener is added.
Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
http://www.w3.org/TR/progress-events/#Using
The example loads an image, and then subscribes to progress events:
function showImage(imageHref) {
var image = document.getElementById('myImage');
image.setAttributeNS(xlinkNS, "href", imageHref);
image.addEventListener("progress",imageLoadProgress,false);
image.addEventListener("load",imageLoadComplete,false);
}
I'm not familiar with xlink, but if it causes the userAgent to
synchronously request a resource, the imageLoadProgress won't get
events.
It seems like it would be necessary to first abort any call, then add
listeners:
// tab-width: 7
function showImage(imageHref) {
var image = document.getElementById('myImage');
// Pretend we have an "abort()" method that stops loading. Removing
the href attribute
// won't stop the load request.
image.abort();
image.addEventListener("progress",imageLoadProgress,false);
image.addEventListener("load",imageLoadComplete,false);
// Set the href attribute to kick off a synchronous req.
image.setAttributeNS(xlinkNS, "href", imageHref);
}
Is this correct.
Garrett