I would prefer "Implementations should ensure that they do not crash or
behave erratically" if you see my point.
But what I don't understand is why the spec thinks that a hostile
NSResolver should be called out, or even what such a thing is.
Best wishes,
Steven Pemberton
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:07:48 +0100, Lachlan Hunt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steven Pemberton wrote:
Out only comment is regarding "1.3. Security Considerations". We are
not convinced of the value of some of this text. For instance we are
not sure how a UA could remain stable in the context of a NSResolver
hanging, or indeed, what "remaining stable" means in this context.
This has been rephrased as:
"Implementations should ensure they do not crash or behave erratically
when facing when facing a hostile NSResolver object."
Please see the latest version of the spec in CVS to review the changes.
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/
Please let me know if you are not satisfied with this response.
