Reply-to set to webapps - note we are in a transition...
On Wed, 28 May 2008 13:01:13 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday someone contacted me on IRC about implementing
XMLHttpRequest.upload from XMLHttpRequest Level 2. It turns out that the
Progress Events specification is not generic enough for both uploading
and downloading as we agreed it should be long ago.
The ProgressEvent.loaded member should probably be defined in a more
abstract way
Can you explain in more detail what should be changed? (Feel free to raise
a new issue for this in the webapps tracker - otherwise I will when I
understasnd a bit more clearly what the issue is about).
and I would actually suggest to rename it to ProgressEvent.transferred
so it's clear that it is about transferred data.
Probably, but like many things we inherited a name and there are existing
implementations using it, so it seemed sensible to keep the names stable.
This is issue 119 [1] in the webapi tracker
[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/webapi/track/issues/119
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
