Doug,
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:39 PM, ext Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Folks-
It might be useful if specific points were raised as issue in the
WebApps Tracker [1], rather than just floating around on email (be
it PDF, HTML, or plaintext). That way, they could be addressed in
a concise and systematic manner.
Do people (specifically, the chairs, the editor, and the
contributors) think this would be useful?
The general model we used in the WAF WG is to document most "issues"
in the spec. We only moved an issue to Tracker when there were clear
differences of opinion i.e. no consensus (and we wanted to document
additional pointers, etc. regarding the issue).
If we follow that model for this case, we would debate/discuss a
specific topic before it is officially moved to an issue in Tracker.
I realize other WGs follow a model where the threshold for adding an
issue to Tracker is a bit more loose. If others think this type of
model is more appropriate, I'd be interested in hearing the rationale.
-Regards, Art Barstow
