Ian Hickson wrote: > Mozilla shows the XML error in its error console, which seem more useful > than exposing the error to script, really. (I expect other browsers do the > same but I haven't checked as recently.)
On 6/19/08, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's useful, but IMHO not nearly as useful as giving the script code the > ability to access the information. Sometimes errors happens in the absence > of the developer, and it's useful to have an easy and automatable way to get > the diagnostics. this always scares me. i'm sure the context is "all information available is only being provided to a trusted source", however.... generally what i've seen is that exposing some information about a parse error to a script is a great way to enable data leaks to a malicious application. iirc mozilla isn't planning on implementing certain css error structures for this reason....
