The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Do you approve advancing the Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation?' (Web Applications Working Group) for Cameron McCormack.
--------------------------------- Do you approve advancing the Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation? ---- Do you approve advancing the Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation? * (x) Yes * ( ) No Rationale: Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): Some suggested changes: * In section 2, in 'must also implement Element Traversal' replace 'Element Traversal' with '<a href="#interface-elementTraversal"><code>ElementTraversal</code></a>'. * s/encounteres/encounters/ * In section 2.5, s/evocation of/accessing/ * In section 3.1, put a space after the second '//' in the example. * In appendix C, remove the "public"s from each method; "public" is always implied on an interface in Java. * The entries in the References appendix should be updated to use the familiar bibliographic format suggested by the W3C Manual of Style (http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#ref-section). These answers were last modified on 9 August 2008 at 03:19:19 U.T.C. by Cameron McCormack Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42538/ET-Advance-2-CR/ until 2008-08-08. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
