On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Marcos Caceres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok. I will add "Any hierarchical URI scheme" as the proposed solution > into the spec. > > I will say that, personally, I feel it is irresponsible for the > WebApps WG to not recommend a complete and a secure solution for this > issue. I also fear that not mandating a URI scheme will lead to > interoperability issues (especially going forward into V2, where we > might want to support things like queries and fragments, which > something like file: does not support).
Well, the questions I asked of you were intended to discover whether or not interoperability was impacted by not specifying a URI scheme. Is there some aspect of this I didn't consider? Can you give me an example of an interoperability (or security, as you say) problem that's created by not specifying a URI scheme? Mark.
