On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marcos Caceres wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Marcos Caceres wrote: >>>> >>>> Ok, hearing no objections, then I propose we bake in the following >>>> file extensions into the spec (we can debate which MIME types to use >>>> after we settle on the extensions!): >>>> >>>> .html >>>> .htm >>>> .css >>>> .gif >>>> .jpeg >>>> .png >>>> .js >>>> .json >>>> .xml >>>> .txt >>>> >>>> The following we should probably bake in too: >>>> .mp3 >>>> .swf >>>> .wav >>>> .svg >>>> .ico >>> >>> I'm not a big fan of "endorsing" mp3 given that it's a patented format >>> that >>> can't be implemented by FOSS software. >>> >>> / Jonas >>> >> >> Ok, no MP3. maybe you can suggest some other suitable audio format? > > I'd stick with wav for now. Possibly also FLAC.
Ok, sounds good. I suppose flac has a .flac extension? (sorry, apart from mp3 and wav, I don't know audio formats at all!) -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
